| Water
Issues |
|
Anantapur
district of Andhra Pradesh in South India comes under a massive
rain shadow. It is supposed to receive an average of 500 millimetres
of rain annually. In the past five years, rainfall has dipped
to 180 mm in the mandals that the Collective works in.
In such
a situation, it is critically important to harvest every drop
of rainfall that is received. Rainwater harvesting not only
ensures that the rainfall is available for use at a later
time, but also has other benefits such as the arresting of
soil loss, improvement in the water table and the increase
in plant life due to increased moisture availability in the
soil. When rainwater harvesting work is carried out over a
widespread geographic area, the land needs to be surveyed
for topological conditions that will affect the flow of water
and appropriate structures created in appropriate locations
such that the whole area is benefited. Such a geographical
spread is known as a watershed.
The Collective's
work in water conservation consists of the following components
:
|
| Restoration
of traditional rain water harvesting structures |

A
watershed |
| Anantapur
district is blessed with some of the finest rain water harvesting
structures. Between 900 and 1500 AD the rulers built exceptional
structures that harvested almost all the rain that fell in the
area. Unfortunately the last 70 to 80 years has seen complete
degradation of these structures especially because the forests
in the catchment areas were destroyed and wrong agricultural
practices took root in the foreshore regions of these structures
(tanks). Today most of the 300 large tanks (between 100 and
1000 acres in spread) and over 2000 smaller tanks have either
gotten silted up and storage capacity reduced drastically or
the bunds have collapsed making the tanks useless. Irrigated
agriculture has been suffering and the farmers are unable to
take more than one crop in a normal year.
Since
the protection and ecological restoration of the hills or
the catchment area of these tanks does not immediately yield
immediate economic advantages to the villagers it is often
difficult to convince them of the necessity of such work,
especially because they have been cut off from the resources
of this land.
|
| Tank
Desiltation |

Tank
at Kothagudikunta |
|
The Collective
therefore decided to simultaneously initiate work that gave
immediate results and improved the situation of the farmers
and thereby motivating them for the "long-term" investment
of ecorestoration. One such work was tank desiltation and
silt application to dry lands in the catchment area from where
the silt came in the first place.
Tank
desiltation is one of the major components implemented by
the CBOs in the project area. Over the years hundreds of acres
have been applied with this silt. All the villages have benefited
tremendously because of the tank desiltation programme. People's
contribution to this programme has been to the tune of 35
to 40 %.
The effect
of tanks desiltation is predominant in Mushtikovela, Kogira
and Kambaalapalli villages. An average yield increase of 5
to 10 bags per acres has been recorded.
The increased
storage in tanks has recharged 10 wells in Kogira and over
20 wells in Mushtikovela. Apart from recharging, presently
the tanks are the main source of drinking water for animals
during summer. As a secondary benefit, the water availability
during summer has benefited many who have taken up brick making
under the "Chief Ministers of Youth Development Programme".
A 100
meters bund of an old Kunta (small rainwater harvesting structure)
was reconstructed near Mushtikovela. This bund was built,
many years ago, across the Brahmdevani vanka, one of the four
major feeder channels to Mushtikovela tank to form a small
Kunta.
The strengthening
of the Kunta bund has increased the percolation - increasing
water in the open wells down stream. This bund was designed
and built by the members of the VSC. Every family from the
village participated by contributing a certain amount as labour
or by contributing bullock carts or stones.
Over the
years financial support for this programme has been received
from OXFAM - UK, CEBEMO, BILANCE, CORDAID - Netherlands, MISERIOR
- Germany through IGSSS - New Delhi.
|
|
|
| Government
initiated watershed programs |

Kothagadikunta
Tank |
|
In recognition
of the Collective's capabilities in the sphere of eco restoration
and community mobilisation, during 2001-2002, the district
administration invited the Collective to become a Project
Implementation Agency (PIA) and take up 14 watersheds spread
over 14 villages and 3 mandals. The idea is to help the villagers
to develop and manage their watersheds. Each of these watersheds
has a geographical spread of over 500 hectares each. The primary
focus has been revitalising small water bodies and towards
the promotion of horticultural activities.
Initially,
a primary survey was conducted. After this, Gram sabhas were
held, to help plan the programme in an inclusive and open
manner. In February and March 2002, PRAs were conducted to
identify existing water bodies such as tanks, springs, water
holes and checkdams.
A few
plans were also made for constructing new water bodies. While
making the social and resource maps during the PRAs, it was
found that each watershed village had as many as 10 to 30
water bodies that needed renovation. Simultaneously, user
groups were formed in every watershed village to take the
responsibility of implementing the programme.
Totally
264 water bodies were initiated. 36 have been completed and
50% work has been completed in another 228 water bodies through
210 user groups. Awareness building on the importance and
future maintenance of these water bodies has been an ongoing
effort. Wage rates were discussed and payments were made during
the user group meetings.
In the
context of heavy investments for ground nut and untimely and
meager rains dry land horticulture is a better alternative.
Under the watershed programme 173 farmers initiated horticulture
in 458 acres. 28,721 pits were dug for this purpose.
Financial
support for this work is being received from DFID - UK through
the APRLP - Goverment of Andhra Pradesh
|
|
Drought related 'Food for Work' programs |

Trench
work at Smasanam |
|
The years
since 2001 have seen unprecedented drought in the region,
and almost 60% groundnut crop failure. This has resulted in
large scale migration for employment.
To counter
this, the Andhra Pradesh government initiated a "Food for
Work" programme to generate employment in the villages. The
then district Collector invited VANA (a network of NGOs, of
which the Collective is a member) to take up some works.
The Collective
as part of VANA implemented the FFW programme in Chennekothapalli,
Ramagiri, and Roddam mandals between October 2001 and September
2002. 47 works were taken up in 23 villages. 4,059 quintals
of rice was expended costing Rs. 22,93,335. Some high lights
of this work are:
- 24,161
work days generated.
- 37,728
water harvesting trenches;
- 13,440
pits for planting trees;
- Land
development work in 136 acres;
- Renovation
of 7 water bodies;
- Land
leveling, trenching etc. for tamarind orchard;
- Link
Roads and New roads.
Water
harvesting trenches were dug in the revenue wastelands belonging
to Kogira, Kambalapalli and Shyapuram villages of Roddam Mandal
and Mushtikovela, Subbarayunipalli and Guvvalagovindampalli
villages of Chennakothapalli mandal. This was taken up in
the Kalpavalli area. The water harvesting trenches help reducing
soil and water runoff. They also collect small pools of rainwater,
which in turn helps growth of vegetation around the trenches.
Trenching
done on the boundaries of the tamarind orchards promoted by
the thrift groups and VSCs helped controlling grazing. The
rain water collected in the trenches also helped faster growth
of the tamarind trees that had been planted.
A 10 km.
road was laid linking Mustikovela and Shyapuram. This work
helped the villages around Mustikovela to become accessible
to Roddam, Shyapuram, Kogira, Kambalapalli and nearby villages
as the motorable distance got reduced by 40 kms. Different
(CBOs) were involved from the planning stage onwards and were
involved in continuous monitoring of the programme.
|
|